Saturday, June 20, 2015

Journal Article Analysis

Article title: From Barthes to Bart: The Simpsons vs. Amadeus
Author: Justin Burton
           
                        In 1984, the movie Amadeus won 8 Academy awards including Best Picture, Best Actor, and Best Director. It focuses on the last 10 years of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart’s life from the eyes of contemporary composer Antonio Salieri. In the movie Salieri just wants to be as talented and loved as Mozart.  Salieri wants this so badly that the movie opens with Salieri trying to confess that he was responsible for the death of Mozart and the movie is thus launched as a narrative of his claim ultimately ending with Salieri pushing a deathly ill Mozart to finish his own Requiem in an effort to see how Mozart created his works.  Though a fantastic movie, it is widely known that is greatly fictionalized.
Article summary:
            Justin Burton, an assistant professor of music at Rider University, takes on Amadeus’ fictional representation by matching it up against the Simpsons’ TV show parody of the movie.
He does this by breaking down critical assessment of the movie by the media and how the reviewers were all in favor of ignoring historical fact to pump up what was a great movie.
                        Roger Ebert noted that the movie’s disinterest in historical accuracy “is not a vulgarization of Mozart, but a way of dramatizing that true geniuses rarely take their own work seriously, because it comes so easily for them.”  Basically saying that historical accuracy must be sacrificed to expose a greater truth.

            He goes on to point how the mythical genius of Mozart is a vehicle for carrying the inaccuracies as fact.  From there he goes into some rather DEEP analysis using Roland Barthes’ formula of how creation of myth occurs.
            In the final Qtr of the article he finally turns to how the Simpson’s created their own better mythology of the Amadeus myths by over caricaturizing the caricatures of Amadeus.
                        He relates how the characters blow up the Amadeus movie myth:
Bart/Mozart takes the Amadeus/Mozart over the top by giving a show as more of a rock star (i.e. playing the piano with his teeth, his posterior etc.) to over sell the rock star persona Tom Hulce gave Mozart in Amadeus.
Homer/Leopold as Mozart’s father is portrayed as shamelessly trying to cash in on his son’s fame and popularity.  Homer/Leopold even scolds Bart/Mozart for not pushing his merchandise after a concert.  In Amadeus, Leopold is shown to be trying to work contracts for Wolfgang, and even comments that he should have a maid to keep is home up.
Lisa/Salieri is shown as desperately trying to outshine her brother and always seemingly getting pushed aside as when her mother tells her “no one practices harder than you, but it’s your brother who keeps us in lead-based face powder”.  Amadeus gives us a similar notion of Salieri as we see him asking God why he gave such immense talent to someone so underserving as Mozart.
                         
Article Analysis:
            Burton does a good job of breaking down the mythology of the movie.  I feel for the ultimate goal of the article, he delves way too deep into the minutiae of creating popular myth.   In an effort to build more foundation for the mythology he references books and articles that really have nothing to do with the movie or TV show other than they address some aspect of the ma Mozart.  He goes too far to demonstrate how other works about Mozart create their own myths about the man.  I found those unneeded and somewhat distracting from the stated purpose of the article.
Agree/disagree:
            I very much agree with Mr. Burton on his analysis, though somewhat unwieldy, of the Amadeus myth vs. the Simpson’s myth.  While I feel he went way into the weeds with his analysis of the subject, he emerged on point even though he could have used a weed wacker.  There is sufficient evidence within his article to show how the creation of the fictional Mozart is bought into and pushed forward by the media and film critics.
Importance of Article
            Taking this article at a view from a 30000 feet, I find it is important as a way to identify when a work is put out and reviewers try to push it as a “new” truth of a subject (though the writers and directors never claimed it to be).  I think it highlights how parody can be used to show the absurdity of a bastardization by turning that bastardization up to 11. Note the reference to “this is Spinal Tap” there - another parody of artists portrayed in movies.
References:

Barton, Justin (2013). From Barthes to Bart: The Simpsons vs.  Amadeus. The journal of popular culture. Vol 46, No. 3. pg 481-500

No comments:

Post a Comment